|
|
Post by team7 on Feb 21, 2017 16:00:35 GMT
I hate vetoing trades especially in a league with most veteran owners but here is my proposal for the review process. Hopefully this gets the conversation going so we can get rules in place.
1. We use the Fantrax Objections- If less than 12 teams object within the time limit stated the trade is processed. If 12 teams object to a trade within 24 hour during the season and 72 hours in the off season we move to step 2 .
2. The trade will be put on hold. Allowing teams to state their concerns on the trade. We may want to have an official thread for this or we can just do it on chat.
3. After 72 hr of being on hold the trade will be revoted on by the league to be vetoed or processed. 12 owners must vote for a veto.
4. 250 K cap penalty for any team that does not vote.
Again this is just a starting point .
|
|
|
|
Post by ComeSaleAway on Feb 21, 2017 23:40:02 GMT
not bad idea
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2017 2:16:08 GMT
I would lower it to 10 as we're working with a pool of only 14 owners and I feel 12 is excessive. You couldn't get 80% of our league to agree the earth is round.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2017 3:31:02 GMT
I like the idea team7 posted. I also agree with Brooklyn that it needs to be lower...10 sounds good to me. I do not like vetos either but don't think 1 person should have the power to decide if a trade should pass or not. that is too much power, especially for a commish that likes to trade as much as turtles...things could spiral out of hand fast and there is nothing that anyone could do except leave the league. this is not an accusation or thought that turtles would do this, just pointing out that it is too much power for one person to have.
|
|
|
|
Post by Commish on Feb 23, 2017 13:35:22 GMT
I like the idea team7 posted. I also agree with Brooklyn that it needs to be lower...10 sounds good to me. I do not like vetos either but don't think 1 person should have the power to decide if a trade should pass or not. that is too much power, especially for a commish that likes to trade as much as turtles...things could spiral out of hand fast and there is nothing that anyone could do except leave the league. this is not an accusation or thought that turtles would do this, just pointing out that it is too much power for one person to have. You do realize it is not my decision to approve/veto trades right? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2017 16:47:57 GMT
i am with TEAM on this but agree with BROOKLYN for 10
|
|
|
|
Post by ComeSaleAway on Feb 26, 2017 0:11:01 GMT
I agree with the trade process that has been suggested however I'm not sure that a fine 250K for people that don't vote makes alot of sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2017 16:42:24 GMT
I think the fine is just one more thing to manage. Why do it? If a trade is bad, the word will get out. If people don't vote it because they don't think the trade was lopsided.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2017 17:25:06 GMT
Exactly. To fine would be dumb
|
|
|
|
Post by team7 on Feb 26, 2017 17:33:42 GMT
I believe the rule was already written without the fine
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2019 17:08:04 GMT
Just want to confirm that in this league I am not allowed to value or devalue my own players and that this must be left up to the rest of the owners? This is correct?
And also would like to confirm that in this league we are NOT allowed to go into a rebuild and shed CAP space in which to build for the future. Just wanted confirmation of these.
|
|
